Interpersonal communication Essay

interpersonal communication Essay Interpersonal communication is defined as the interaction mingled with two or more than individuals. Where this is the case, the tendency for betrothals to take place is almost inevitable. This is because most spate do non turn out the same opinions, needs and/or mindsets. The effects of conflicts can be disruptive to relationships. However, if handled well, conflicts can contri merelye positively by improving understanding and tolerance among people, as well as fortify the bonds between them. Thus, the mien that atomic number 53 employs in expressing and managing interpersonal conflicts plays a life-and-death role in maintaining and improving the quality of communication in his/her relationship. The word picture Parenthood features several conflicts between its characters. The nature of conflicts varies, as well as the style characters adopt in reacting to and resolving conflicts which draw close. gill and Karen, the main characters of the movie, much face disagreements like each married couple does. However, the greatest blood between them arises when lamella comes home angry after quitting his job one day and having Karen inform him that she is pregnant. Being in an easily irritable tell at that time, Karens pregnancy did not bring joy to him. Instead, he reacts to her negatively, fashioning her feel as if he did not want the baby. This created a minus communication climate between them. Karen feels that she is underappreciated and the defensive mechanism in her is activated. They protrude arguing about the severity of apiece former(a)s mixed-up because of the unexpected baby. They some(prenominal) react to the situation with direct aggression verb in ally attacking and hurt the other partys position. As a result, the issue was not firm but amplified. In actual fact, the impact of the conflict could have been reduced if a different style of expression was utilize. For example, having known that Gil l had just lost his job and was in a foul mood, Karen could choose to withhold the parole of her pregnancy until later when Gills emotional turbulence has settled. This non-assertive style may be more appropriate in view of the situation at hand. Also, she could be more supportive and understanding towards his decision. According to Jack Gibb, empathy contributes greatly to a positive relational climate. Being able to accept anothers feelings and putting oneself in their place would make them feel valued and cared about. This encourages them to open up to the other party, making communication much more effective. However, non-assertion should only be used sparingly because it does not go to the root of the problem. In order to carry through a satisfying resolution, Gill and Karen should discuss the issue later in a calm and peaceful manner, adopting the assertive style of communication. They should allow each other to express their thoughts and feelings directly about the issue an d then flood tide up with a win-win solution. Both parties should respect each other and their password should be problem oriented- finding a way in which some(prenominal) parties needs are satisfied and working out some musical arrangement which makes everyone feel like a winner (Adler, 2003, p.229). Another instance of conflict in like manner occurs between Suzan, Gills sister, and her husband, Nathan. Their problem revolves around the upbringing style of their daughter, patty. Nathan insists that Patty should be given strict education in all aspects, contempt her young age, in order for her full potential to be utilised. Suzan, on the other hand, feels that her daughter should be given a normal childhood. in any case that, she also feels that her husband is creation too uptight and controlling, ever so behaving as if he knows best. This is seen when Nathan insists that they should only have one child despite Suzans begin to re-discuss the issue with him. However, inst ead of confronting the problem, Suzan chooses to be passive aggressive. She pretends to put up with his practices such as power-eating but secretly chows down sweets and chocolates as a emblem of anger and discontent. Eventually, her approach no longer calms her anger and she finally tells Nathan that she is release him. There are several factors which contribute to the aggravation of their conflict. Primarily, Nathans controlling and always certain port lots causes Suzan to feel that her opinions and feelings are unimportant. He a great deal imposes his way of life on her with little regard to her needs. In summation to that, he also rarely accepts and acknowledges her suggestions and ideas. For instance, when Suzan tells him that Patty should be allowed to behave more like a normal child instead of constantly being strictly guided, he ridicules her frustration and rejects her concern. In another context, Suzans method of intervention her unhappiness- passive aggression- is also not an effective manner. It not only does not allow Nathan to know his mistakes, it creates an illusion which shows as if she is happy with her situation. The resolution of the conflict, as seen in the ending of the movie, was when Nathan finally realises his fault after having Suzan leave him. This corroboratory communication used by Suzan is nonetheless effective, even though thither could be a possibility of Nathan misinterpreting her intentions. Her extreme measures lead Nathan to re-evaluate his behavior and erupt that his methods in handling their relationship are inappropriate. Finally, he apologises to her sincerely and receives her forgiveness. Since then, his behavior changes for the better and their relationship becomes stronger. Aside from marital conflicts, there are also conflicts between parent and child in the movie. For example, the relationship between Gill and his son, Kevin. Kevin is a very sensitive and emotional child. As a result, Gill has to be extra careful in handling him. Conflicts often arise when Kevin becomes upset by something trivial. For example, when Kevin thinks of himself as being abnormal because he was sightedness a psychiatrist, Gill has to comfort and ensure him that things were alright. In this situation, Gill adopts an substantiating communication approach. He tells Kevin that he was seeing a psychiatrist not because he was sick or abnormal, only more prone to hassle than others and that the doctor was there to help him conquer this anxiety. He then shifts Kevins counselling from the topic to his upcoming birthday celebration. This lights up Kevins mood and resolves the tension between them. Gills method, in this case, is effective because any other method may have irritated Kevin further. Also, as a loving and supportive father, Gill often tries to maintain a confirming communication climate between them. He displays great levels of empathy and equality when interacting with Kevin. He tries to understand h is sons needs and emotions instead of dictating them establish on his personal experiences. Thus, because of his efforts, the conflicts that arise between them each time is resolved appropriately. In conclusion, conflicts will always be prevalent in any interpersonal relationships. Be it between husband and wife, parent and child or friends, conflict is sure to arise because of the unique difference between every individual. It is how people manage and express the conflicts that would determine whether the resolution is satisfying for all parties. Thus, it is crucial that one be able to adopt the proper style in expressing his/her dissatisfaction based on the situation at hand in order to reduce the impact of conflicts and maintain healthy interpersonal relationships.BibliographyAdler, R.B., Rodman, G. (2003) apprehensiveness Human Communication. New York Oxford University Press.